A blog about government-to-citizen digital communication and engagement, Government 2.0, GovDelivery, and other e-government issues
Header

We've been looking at different Web 2.0 sites and exploring how best clients can use them in conjunction with our system and on their own.

One site I like is Twitter.  Twitter allows an organization or an individual to post a couple of lines about what they are doing at a given moment.  This overlaps with the Facebook "status" update so I thought it wouldn't be worth the effort.  However, now that I've got Twitter working well with Facebook, I can update my status on Twitter and it gets posted everywhere.  Twitter is easier to use and something that can be updated quickly from a cell phone or blackberry.

I don't have any specific ideas yet for interconnections between GovDelivery and Twitter, but in looking around, I did see a lot of Twitter accounts being managed by government agencies and public officials.  Take a look at the GovDelivery Twitter Account and Who We are Following.  You can also take a look at my "young" Twitter account.

Here are just a few:
http://twitter.com/pueblo81009
http://twitter.com/USAgov

NASA has many offices and programs using Twitter.  As usual, they are very advanced in use of Web 2.0 tools.

and lots of public officials:
http://twitter.com/MayorMark
http://twitter.com/MayorRTRybak

Why does this matter?  Any government entity has a lot of information to offer.  Twitter is an easy way to pull forward and call attention to the information that you think might be most interesting or valuable.  I've blogged before on the difference between "give me what I want" content and "give me what you think I need" content

Twitter allows an agency to highlight for me the information that I might need and to do it in a simple and interesting way. 

During our Web 2.0 Webinar last Tuesday, many participants asked for examples of existing government blogs. Since we didn't have a chance to answer this question during the Webinar, we assembled this list to show that blogs are being published at all levels of government.

Federal
    http://blog.aids.gov
    http://www.tsa.gov/blog/
    http://www.cdc.gov
    http://blog.epa.gov

State/Local
    http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us/trees/blog.htm
    http://www.humanrights.state.mn.us/velblog3.html#
    http://www.ci.santa-paula.ca.us/blog/
    http://secondward.blogspot.com/

This is not meant to be a comprehensive list. It's only a sample of the many blogs that are being published by governments throughout the United States.

Please let us know about other government blogs you are reading.

My company, GovDelivery, just completed a Webinar on Web. 2.0 in government where we had 150 attendees.  The quality of the questions was very exciting because it shows how much government Web managers are thinking about how best to use Web 2.0 to meet the needs of the public.

For anyone who attended the webinar or is interested in this topic, I want to point out some useful links:

  1. Previous post on Web 2.0  which includes a useful glossary
  2. Follow-up on Cloud Computing
  3. Post on TSA Blog

Also, we have some upcoming webinars on on-demand emailing (cloud computing) and other topics as well as a recorded version of the Government Web 2.0 webinar you can request from us by going to the registration page.

My previous entry was on Web 2.0 in government.  I want to add some fresh links and expand the conversation to cloud computing which some people, in an effort to give the entire world a headache, refer to as "Web 3.0".

Before we talk about Web 2.0+, let me share this glossary of Web 2.0 terms.  I used to go mad trying to understand all of the Web 2.0 / Web 3.0 terms.  Blogs, Wikis, Folksonomies, Mashups, Tags, Tag Clouds, Widgets, Cloud Computing, SaaS, etc.  Like Web 2.0 itself, there is no one in charge of Web 2.0 and the terminology has taken on a life of its own.

While I initially thought Web 2.0 was just for kids (hence all of the annoying terms), I'm a convert now.  Facebook really makes my life better both personally and professionally.  Mashups allow our company to deliver more value than ever to the government, and SaaS companies serve our most critical CRM and Web conferencing needs.

Most importantly, I'm convinced that cloud computing is going to make technology more powerful and cost-effective for government in so many ways that we will look back on 2008 10 years from now and see it as the infancy of e-government.

To that end, I want to add another important link which is this story on cloud computing.

We have over 250 government agencies using our Software as a Service platform here at GovDelivery.  I don't consider use of our hosted, SaaS, platform by itself as cloud computing, but now that the service is becoming more open and allowing other applications to tap into it for limited functions, it really is "service in the cloud."  For us, this means allowing agencies to connect to our "On-Demand Mailer" whenever an agency needs additional mail sending scale for certain applications or needs to send a message to a stakeholder with assured delivery to the inbox, tracking, reporting, etc.

The article referenced above lists these benefits of cloud computing:

  • Reduced Cost
  • Increased Storage
  • Highly Automated
  • Flexibility
  • Allows IT to Shift Focus  "No longer having to worry about constant server updates and other computing
    issues"

This list of benefits is literally the Holy Grail of government IT!

The article concludes with the typical security concerns that are always raised when government talks about doing something new.  Here is the good news, it's not all or nothing. 

For example, the On-Demand Mailer service we offer is currently built to handle emails you are already sending out over the public Internet. 

We are not offering the service to the CIA for sending highly-classified emails… that is not something that belongs in the Cloud. 

Still, there are many services that fit well into the Cloud now.  Web 2.0 and cloud computing raise all kinds of security concerns.  Luckily, from the looks of all the blogs, Wikis, mashups, etc. that we see on government sites despite the security concerns raised about Web 2.0 in government, government Web and e-government managers will find the appropriate areas where they can leverage cloud computing without taking unnecessary security risks.

Everyone is talking about and writing about government 2.0 recently.

There was a great write up in FCW with a panel interview that included Bev Godwin from USA.gov and others.

There was another post on Mashable.com that provided an "Insider's Perspective" on government 2.0.

My company, GovDelivery, has made a big push into Web 2.0 in the past year.   We've found a lot of enthusiasm from our clients in a few key areas.

    1. Collaboration: Using the Web 2.0 concept of "mashups" to present the citizen with "one stop shopping" for government information.  Another Web 2.0 concept, Software as a Service, SaaS, makes mashups a lot easier.

      Example: Use the Get Email Updates link on this DHS page and watch how you are walked through a subscription process that brings together many agencies including some outside DHS. [This is my only example that is "powered by" GovDelivery)

    2. Distribution: Enabling websites, RSS feeds, and email alerts with forwarding and posting capabilities that allow citizens to repost publications and announcements to social networks, tagging sites, blogs, etc.

      Examples: Visit www.state.gov and look in the upper right for a simple widget that allows you to repost content or tag it using social networking sites.  Another great example is the FBI Widget Tool.

    3. Aggregation: Bringing together content by using tag clouds and other tagging approaches

      Examples:  See right side of NASA homepage; CDC has also experimented with tag clouds.

    4. Blogging: Posting content updates or more colorful blog-style entries and allowing citizens to comment. 

      Examples: Local government excels here with more blogs than I could possibly list for Mayor's and elected officials (take a look here).  These officials are embracing Web 2.0 in campaigns and they bring the same concepts into office.  One interesting blog is the DC Summer Intern Blog.

      In federal government, for all the discussion and fear around blogging, there are some truly terrific examples (and no disasters that I know of).  DoD sets the standard, but TSA, GovGab, and the Secretary of Transportation are also running exceptional blogs.

In short, for all the discussion about risks, government 2.0 (aka, government's embrace of Web 2.0) is already here.  In many cases, government is further along than private industry in embracing Web 2.0

Sure, some agencies are further along than others, but the progress and momentum is amazing.  Remember, these concepts are all relatively new. 

Additional resources:

  • If you're interested in blogging, you must read "Naked Conversations"
  • The Federal Consulting Group recently hosted a Webinar on Government 2.0 where I participated along with FEMA.  Register for a recorded version of this here
  • Janice Nall from the CDC discusses their strategy here

If you're interested in this topic, we have another upcoming Webinar on Government 2.0.   

Our webinars are focused on how governments can use our platform to take advantage of some of these concepts, but we've received good feedback that we don't lay the sales pitch on too hard, and anyone is welcome to attend.

Back in June, I posted to this blog in response to a paper out of Princeton that proposed that content structure ought to be the number one priority for governments going online.  The premise is that if content is structured well, then private sector players can re-purpose the content.  The paper states that private parties will do a better job of organizing and distributing content than government.  I feel that the paper undervalues the role played by government Web managers.

FCW has just posted a slightly updated version of my commentary.

There are some other interesting posts related to this topic including one from a terrific anonymous blogger at ".GovWatch."

I have had a few people comment (offline) about my entry singing the praises of the TSA.  There is such a negative vibe around air travel these days, I think many people are overlooking some of the steps the TSA is taking to make travel easier and their service better.

Here is a subtle example.

My drivers license expires this August 19 on my birthday.

On a flight to Indianapolis in June, the TSA agent noticed the upcoming expiration and said, "don't forget to renew your license."  I had no idea the license was about to expire.  I recently moved and changed the address on my license, but apparently that did not reset the clock on the expiration.

When I said, "thank you," she said, "we're trained to remind people when it's a few months until expiration since it can take a while to renew."  That's good training.  Probably makes the job more interesting too.

I applied for the new license last week.  At airport security this week in Minneapolis, I showed the guard my license and said, "it's clipped so I'll need to pull out the receipt showing that my new one is in the mail."  He said that TSA rules allow him to accept my license for a year after it expires with no extra paperwork.  Cheers!

So, TSA is taking it upon itself to remind me about my license and then is showing intelligent flexibility by still accepting the license as ID after it is expired… after all, they want to know who I am not that I have valid driving privileges and qualifying eye sight like the DMV.  This really makes sense!

On a more awesome note, they are actively trying to get rid of the "remove your shoes" policy which you can read about at their unusually good blog

I'm not selling TSA fan club t-shirts yet, but as someone who travels far too much, I really appreciate these efforts.

I heard the news Tuesday morning about California's 5.4 magnitude earthquake and instantly saw coverage on multiple communications channels – web, television, wireless, email, etc.  In today's world, information is instantaneous.  As I continued to read through other news of the day, there was a topic that wasn't a one-time event but a recurring one that we're all too familiar with – the budget crisis many states are currently facing.  In working with many government agencies, I've seen first hand how innovative leaders address the need for improved communication and services, while dealing with budget constraints.  They've done this by investing in solutions that are integrated with or complementary to existing solutions.

A good example of such an agency is the City of Riverside, CA.  The City uses an email alert system to notify its citizens of more than city information and services – it also sends out emergency notifications to the public and to its emergency operations CERT team members. In the case of Tuesday's earthquake, the city used it email alert system to immediately communicate with its 251 CERT members with the most up-to-date earthquake information.  Information included time of earthquake, location, CERT activation status and reminders to stay off cell phones and land lines.

Riverside utilizes its email alert service to update citizens on general topics and services, in addition to emergency related notifications.  Using existing resources like website content, they are able to provide more information and better service to citizens.  You can see the service in action by visiting their website at www.riversideca.gov.

Are you trying to understand your website traffic?

I am a big fan of a service called Quantcast

From their website:
Quantcast is a new media measurement service that enables advertisers to view
audience reports for millions of sites and services to build their brands with
confidence.

This service is incredibly useful for the public sector.  Here are just a few interesting uses:

1) Understand your own audience using the demographics tab
2) Understand how your audience overlaps with the audiences of other websites.  This allows you to identify websites you might want to target for collaboration (our company, GovDelivery, allows public sector clients to collaborate and cross-promote with each other so we use Quantcast to see audience overlaps between different websites)
3) See the frequency of your visits.  Quantcasts classifies visitors between addicts, regulars, and passers-by.

In my experience, the service undercounts website traffic by 30-60%, but it is still directionally accurate, and it gives you excellent information about your website and the user traffic of others.

I welcome any feedback on how you make use of this service and how the numbers you see from your own analytic tools compare with what Quantcast is telling you about your website.

Recently I came across an interesting paper from Princeton
University titled "Government Data and the Invisible Hand." The paper proposes
ways that government can do a better job making information more available to
citizens. It's a good read and only ten pages: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1138083

The paper makes a strong statement that government web sites
have failed to provide government data to the public, and that private industry
can do a better job. I don't agree with this view, but I believe that the paper
makes many insightful observations and provides useful direction to policy
makers as well as government professionals involved in planning the future of
the web and e-government within individual agencies.

 

The bottom line from my standpoint:

1)       As the authors
of the paper suggest, government should put far more energy into publishing
information in highly-structured formats so that the information can be
repurposed for distribution by other organizations (private, public,
non-profit, etc.).

2)       The authors
think government should make structuring content the top priority, but they
discount two areas where the government Web manager plays a critical role.  First, the government Web manager acts as an
editor raising awareness of the most valuable content.  An agency may have 50 publications on its
website on a certain topic, the government Web manager can feature the publication
that is most current and has the most potential public valuable.  Second, government agencies are increasingly
acting as citizen/customer relationship managers by learning what citizens are
interested in, recommending complementary services and content, and creating
ongoing ways of receiving updates direct from the government.  In my opinion, the biggest obstacle for a
citizen trying to get content or services from the government is time.  Government Web managers are increasingly
adept at making interaction with their agencies more efficient.

 

On the web, we value Amazon's ability to create an efficient
and pleasant shopping experience over its ability to offer lots of different
products.  Amazon features the most interesting
(or maybe profitable) products, allows users to see suggestions based on what
other users have purchased, and gathers information from users so it can notify
them when new information and products of interest are available.  In working with federal agencies since 2003,
I've seen enormous strides in how government Web managers understand their
audience and play the role of trusted editor. 
In addition, we've seen many government websites deploy strategies to
use the website as the hub of the citizens relationship with the agency so that
it serves not just as a content repository, but also as a place to signup for email
updates and submit questions and comments. 
In full disclosure, my company, GovDelivery, is a private sector
organization that serves many governments with a digital communication
platform.  This might make me bias, but
it also gives me insight into how government websites have leveraged at least
one platform created in the private sector to offer tens of thousands of
different topics for subscription and send over 50 million digital messages out
every month.  This seems to be the best
of both worlds.  Government controls the
content, the message, and the citizen relationship, but is able to leverage the
best technology from the private sector. 
Should GovDelivery fail to continue to innovate and meet government
needs, another company will step in to fill the new needs of the government (this
is exactly how companies move between technology providers over time). 

Highly-structured content on government websites has the benefit
of making the websites easier to manage and facilitating easy deployment of new
services that leverage the content in different ways.  This is a tremendous benefit, but expecting
the private or non-profit sectors to manage and improve this type of service
without a direct connection to the government agency is, in my opinion, like telling
Amazon to outsource its homepage and its customer database.